This page provides a brief overview of the research projects in which I am involve as either the primary investigator or research collaborator. There are four ongoing projects:
- Unification in Action? North Korean Defector-Migrant Integration and Support Expansion
- Who Stays and Who Leaves? Determinants of Public Support for Permanent Residency, Citizenship, and Rights Expansion in South Korea and Japan
- Information Dissemination in North Korea: The Role of Social Networks, Markets, and Social Change
- The National Scale-ups Project: Exploring the Landscape of Canada’s High-Performing Firms
1. Unification in Action? North Korean Defector-Migrant Integration and Support Expansion
Project Participants: Steven Denney (University of Vienna) and Christopher Green (Leiden University).
Project summary: Are North Korean defector-migrants fully integrating into South Korean society? Despite a shared ethnic and cultural background, a right to citizenship, and generous resettlement benefits and other forms of support, many of these migrants struggle to substantively integrate into South Korea. Using survey experiments (ratings-based and forced-choiced conjoints) supported by open-text questions, this research seeks to identify the characteristics that motivate acceptance into the national community along economic, political, and social dimensions. It also explores what motivates expansion of specific support, in the form of greater resources dedicated for defector-migrant entrepreneurs.
Funding: This project is supported by an Academy of Korean Studies competitive research grant (2020-2021).
2. Who Stays and Who Leaves? Determinants of Public Support for Permanent Residency, Citizenship, and Rights Expansion in South Korea and Japan
Project Participants: Steven Denney (University of Vienna), Charles Crabtree (Dartmouth University), Nicholas Fraser (University of California, Berkeley), and Peter Ward (University of Vienna).
Project Summary: This study seeks to understand what shapes public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policies in South Korea and Japan. It approaches the question in two ways. First, it examines the integration of (im)migrants. Drawing broadly from the literature in migration and citizenship, we ask whether native South Koreans and Japanese are supportive of the permanent resettlement and eventual naturalization of current immigrants. In addition to direct questions, we also explore what types of immigrants these populations would accept as permanent residents and eventual citizens using a survey experiments that presents a hypothetical pilot resettlement program. We specifically explore to what degree civic legacies influence public opinion pertaining to integration policies.
Second, this project looks at what determines support for the expansion of immigrants’ rights. Elite politics and public attitudes literatures have yet to be reconciled on this question. Using a series of conjoint and endorsement experiments, we explore whether natives support the expansion of immigrants’ rights.
3. Information Dissemination in North Korea: The Role of Social Networks, Markets, and Social Change
Project Participants: Steven Denney (University of Vienna) and Peter Ward (University of Vienna)
Project Summary: In North Korea, the state’s monopoly on information was shattered during the famine of the 1990s. Some North Koreans have since become regular consumers of foreign media, including South Korean and US media, including TV shows and current affairs content. But what kind of information do they consume and disseminate, and why? Using observational and experimental survey instruments, this project seeks to identify the determinants of non-state information dissemination within North Korean society and how these information flows can be promoted. Information dissemination is a dynamic process that occurs within a social context.
Funding: This project is supported by a National Endowment for Democracy research grant (2019-2021).
4. The National Scale-ups Project: Exploring the Landscape of Canada’s High-Performing Firms
Project Participants: Steven Denney (University of Toronto), Viet Vu (Ryerson University), Ryan Kelly (Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada), and David Wolfe (University of Toronto).
Project Summary: Research in entrepreneurship receives much scholarly and public policy attention, as businesses form an integral part of our economy. In the last two decades, research in entrepreneurship has focused on the role of young and/or high-growth firms — what many call “scale-ups” (or high-growth firms). The interest in scale-ups stem from the promise such firms hold in fulfilling several key policy objectives, including employment gains, technological innovation, and economic competitiveness. It is often understood, in Canada and elsewhere, that with the right mix of policy support and a dash of serendipity, governments can spur the creation of companies that contribute to the country’s employment growth, support innovation, and ensure the country’s global competitiveness for years to come. For many, scale-ups are seen as the guarantors of national prosperity.
Despite the interest in scale-ups, discourse on the subject often lacks even definitional clarity. What is a scale-up, and how do we define it? Does it matter which growth metric is used, and does it change how we identify and describe scale-up activity? The literature on the subject is not without answers to these questions, but they often are scattered across studies rather than brought together for purposes of comparison. Without a clearer understanding of basic questions like these, it is difficult to know how, or even whether, scale-ups of different types can achieve the key policy objectives identified above. The problem, in Canada at least, is the lack of a comprehensive framework and good data for understanding these firms.
This project fills a substantive knowledge and data gap using administrative microfiles (the NALMF dataset) linked to detailed financial data through Statistic Canada’s Business Registry (BR) and other datasets, including the Exporter Registry and PATSTAT (for patents). Through descriptive and economic analysis, this project explores the significance of different scale-up definitions and then evaluates their economic impact across various metrics, including employment, revenue, and innovation. Using survey data, namely that from the Survey of Finance and Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises, the project also considers unique barriers faced by scale-ups and barriers to scale.
Funding: This project is supported primarily by a Mitacs Accelerate grant (2019-2021) and funding managed through the Brookfield Institute for Innovation + Entrepreneurship.